Effects of mycotoxins in poultry

Poultry are farm animals with heterogeneous sensitivity to mycotoxins, as different species suffer different toxic effects. Ducks, geese and turkeys seem to be more susceptible to these toxic secondary metabolites compared to broilers.


In general, common aflatoxin-induced symptoms are decreases in performance - reduced weight gain and feed conversion rate (FCR) -, as well as weight and size variation of the organs such as the liver, spleen, kidneys, bursa of Fabricius and thymus. Birth hatch defects induced by Aflatoxin (Afla) cause an increase in the number of chicks that are rejected at the beginning of the production cycle.1 In addition, Afla are immune suppressive; they affect innate, cell-mediated and humoral responses, causing symptoms such as abnormal behavior (birds standing together in groups), and other nervous syndrome related signs.2,3,4 Intoxication with aflatoxin B1 (AfB1) affects cell-mediated immunity by decreasing the concentration of albumin and globulin, and therefore it exerts an important role in the inhibition of protein synthesis.5 Additionally, impairments in major serum biochemistry parameters, gut barrier, energy and amino acid digestibility were found when feeding AfB1-contaminated feed to broiler chicks.6 AfB1-carry over was observed in eggs, tissues (kidney, liver, muscle, ova) and the blood of laying hens.7 Aflatoxin M1, classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a group 1 carcinogen (highly carcinogenic to humans), can be found in the kidneys.8

more about Aflatoxins

Ergot Alkaloids

Ergot alkaloids may induce neurotoxic effects, leading to reduced feed intake because the birds are reluctant to move and may suffer from respiratory difficulties.41 Birds affected by ergot alkaloids showed poor growth and decreased egg production. The most obvious pathological changes are gangrenous lesions on the toes, beak and claws.42

more about Ergot alkaloids


Main symptoms observed with dietary Fumonisin (FUM) administration were decreased body weight and average daily weight gain – due to modulation of intestinal function and disruption of gut integrity - as well as increased liver and gizzard weights, followed by increased sphinganine to sphingosine (Sa/So) ratios.30,31,32 Studies conducted in 2015 on broiler chickens revealed significant modulation of the Sa/So ratio in liver, kidneys, jejunum and caecum. Up-regulations of pro-inflammatory cytokines occurred in the small intestine, suggesting that animals were stressed.30 FUM are predisposing factors for the development of necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens.31 A study from 2015 revealed that birds receiving a diet containing a mixture of FUM and Clostridium perfringens were more prone to develop necrotic enteritis compared to the control that received only the C. perfringens challenge.31 According to the authors, one reason could have been the involvement of FUM in the modulation of the gut microbiota that favored the growth of C. perfringens.31, 32 Furthermore, the group that receive the FUM contaminated diet showed a great alteration of the Sa/So ratio, reduced villus height and crypt depth in the ileum.33 Subacute exposure of broiler chicks to FB1 induced liver oxidative stress concomitantly with Sa/So accumulation.28 Similar effects were observed in turkeys which seem to be even more sensitive to FUM.36,37 Effects on the immune system, such as a reduction in white blood cell counts in chicks fed fumonisin B1 (FB1) contaminated diets, were reported as well.38 Additionally, FB1 exposure induced morphological and functional alterations (number and phagocytic ability) in the peritoneal macrophages population of chickens, implying that FB1 exposure may increase the susceptibility of chickens to bacterial infections.39 To evaluate FUM-carry over, 30-week-old laying hens received an intravenous (2 mg/kg BW) or an oral dose (2 mg/kg BW) of 14C-FB1 and showed no relevant residues of FUM (<10-15 ng fumonisin/g) in tissues, suggesting that there is no substantial contribution to human exposure.40

more about Fumonisins


Young chicks and turkeys are very sensitive to ochratoxins.4 These nephrotoxins suppress feed intake, growth, egg production and have a negative influence on eggshell quality.2 Administration of Ochratoxin (OTA) can reduce immunoglobulin concentration in birds’ sera and alter cellular, humoral and innate immune responses.28 In addition, OTA can potentiate inflammation at target sites, primarily in the kidneys, while reducing the capacity of immune cells to respond to inflammation.29

more about Ochratoxins


Type A Trichothecenes

Type-A trichothecenes (T-2 toxin, HT-2 toxin, diacetoxyscirpenol) are of major concern to the poultry industry and can cause severe productivity losses. These mycotoxins are highly toxic to poultry, especially chickens, as suggested by their very low LD50 values (2 mg/kg for diacetoxyscirpenol and 4 mg/kg for T-2 toxin).4 In particular, T-2 toxin causes reduced feed intake, body weight (BW) and egg production, oral lesions and impaired nutrient absorption.9 Furthermore, T-2 toxin can reduce egg production, and increase the incidence of cracked eggs.10 T-2 toxin is cytotoxic to chicken macrophages in vitro.18

Trichothecenes: deoxynivalenol (DON)

DON had first been recognized for its pro-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activities. This mycotoxin is capable of impairing the intestinal barrier function and integrity, by affecting the intestinal surface area and function of the tight junctions.11, 12, 13 A compromised barrier function is associated with an increased epithelial permeability and translocation of pathogens and other toxic entities, as well as a non-specific inflammatory response and an overstimulation of the gut-associated immune system.11, 12, 13 In this context, several studies demonstrated that DON is a promoting factor for the development of necrotic enteritis and coccidiosis in poultry, even at concentrations that lay below the EU guidance levels.32, 45, 46

A study conducted in 2012 investigated the toxic effects of DON and its derivatives (3-ADON and 15-ADON) using in vitro (intestinal epithelial cell line), ex vivo (intestinal explants), and in vivo (animals exposed to mycotoxin-contaminated diets) models.14 The great impact of DON and its derivatives on intestinal morphology was demonstrated. DON significantly reduced the size of villi, the area for absorption and the area of the epithelial cells. Concerning the derivatives, the study concluded that 3-ADON was the less toxic form, whereas 15-ADON was capable of causing more histological lesions than DON or 3-ADON.14 Administration of feed contaminated with DON, can cause decreases in performance caused by impaired feed intake and lower weight gain, gizzard mucosa erosions and lesions, impaired hematological parameters, serum minerals and glucose levels.15 According to the literature, DON can significantly influence eggshell weight and thickness.16 Trichothecenes suppress cellular and humoral responses as well. Specifically, DON promotes leukocyte apoptosis and reduces Newcastle Disease humoral titers in 18-week old pullets.20, 21

more about Trichothecenes


In comparison to other species such as Opens internal link in current windowswine, poultry are less affected by and also appear to be less sensitive to type-B trichothecenes.17,18 Nevertheless, Zearalenone (ZEN) may have some negative effects on both fertility and hatchability of fertile eggs. In general, feeding different Fusarium toxins such as DON, ZEN, and fusaric acid resulted in a significant decrease in immunological parameters such as the biliary IgA level, an important line of defense against bacteria and viruses.19

more about Zearalenone

Carry over into animal products

Eggs did not contribute significantly to the dietary intake of DON in humans, as neither the parental compound nor the DON-conjugates were ever detected at significant concentrations in the egg yolk and albumen of laying hens.23 Similar conclusions can be drawn for carry-over of DON to turkey meat, although traces of this mycotoxin (2 ng/mL and 4 ng/mL) were detected in bile.24 Carry-over of T-2 to eggs was observed in birds fed 0.25 mg radiolabeled T-2 toxin/kg bodyweight, according to the literature.25, 26 The maximum residues in eggs were detected 24 hours after feeding, with the yolk containing 0.04% and the white 0.13% of the total dosage applied. Traces of ZEN have been detected in bile.24,27

Synergistic effects in poultry

PoultryAflatoxin B1 (AFB1) shows synergistic interactions with OTA when fed simultaneously to broiler chicks, affecting the liver and kidneys.43 Furthermore, the literature reports that the liver tissue of broilers fed diets contaminated with OTA and AFB1 contained markedly higher concentrations of OTA compared to diets contaminated with OTA alone.33 DON significantly increases the severity of T-2 toxin-induced lesions. According to the literature, interactions between FUM and moniliformin significantly influenced haematological parameters, whereas FUM and T-2 in combination with fusaric acid increased embryo mortality and enhanced oral lesions and mortality.44 Challenging broiler chicks with Eimeria spp., a pathogen responsible for coccidiosis, and a mixture of FUM and DON, results in metabolic and immunologic disturbances that amplify the severity of coccidiosis at subclinical mycotoxins levels.45

A recently conducted study investigated the impact of DON and FUM on the intestinal barrier in broiler chickens, more specifically on the mucus layer and antioxidative response to oxidative stress.46 The authors concluded that simultaneous distribution of DON and FUM at concentrations close to the European Union maximum guidance levels (5 mg DON and 20 mg FB1 + FB2/kg feed) had a negative influence on the intestinal mucus layer and several intestinal epithelial antioxidative mechanisms.46 Specifically, DON and FUM affected the duodenal mucus layer by suppressing the expression of intestinal mucin (MUC) 2 and intestinal zinc transporter (ZnT)-1 genes; and altering the mucin monosaccharide composition.46 Furthermore, both mycotoxins interfered with the intracellular methionine homeostasis, which is important for preserving the cell’s critical antioxidant activity.46 

A summary of the synergistic and additive effects of mycotoxins in poultry is presented in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1: Synergistic and additive effects in poultry

Figure 1: Synergistic and additive effects in poultry

AFB1 – Aflatoxin B1; FB1 – Fumonisin B1; DON – Deoxynivalenol; OTA – Ochratoxin A FA – Fusaric acid; DAS – Diacetoxyscirpenol; CPA – Cyclopiazonic acid; MON - Moniliformin

Red line: synergistic effect
Dashed line: additive effect

Effects of Mycotoxins in Poultry

AFB1 – Aflatoxin B1 | AFM1 – Aflatoxin M1 | DON – Deoxynivalenol | FUM – Fumonisins | OTA – Ochratoxin A | T-2 – T-2 Toxin | HT-2 – HT-2 Toxin | ZEN - Zearalenone | Ergots – Ergot, Alkaloids

  1. Cilievici, O., Cordos, I., Ghidus, E., and Moldovan, A. (1980). The toxic and teratogenic effect of aflatoxin B1 on the chick embryo development. Morphol. Embryol. (Bucur.): 309-314.
  2. CAST Report. (2003). Mycotoxins: risks in plant, animal, and human systems (Richard JL and Payne G A (eds.), Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Task Force Report No. 139, Ames, Iowa, USA.
  3. Bondy, G.S., and Pestka, J.J. (2000). Immunomodulation by fungal toxin. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B 3: 109-143.
  4. Leeson, S., Diaz, G., and Summers, J.D. (1995). Poultry metabolic disorders and mycotoxins. University Books, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  5. Ghosh, R.C., Chauhan, H.V.S., and Jah, G.J. (1991). Suppression of cell-mediated immunity by purified aflatoxin B1 in broiler chicks. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 28: 165-172.
  6. Chen, X., Naehrer, K., and Applegate, T.J. (2016). Interactive effects of dietary protein concentration and aflatoxin B1 on performance, nutrient digestibility, and gut health in broiler chicks. 2016 Poultry Science 0:1–14.
  7. Völkel, I., Schröer-Merker, E., and Czerny, C-P. (2011). The carry-over of mycotoxins in products of animal origin with special regard to its implications for the European food safety legislation. Food and Nutrition Sciences 2: 852-867.
  8. Trucksess, M.W., Stoloff, L., Young, K., Wyatt, R.D., and Miller, B.L. (1983). Aflatoxicol and aflatoxins B1 and M1 in eggs and tissues of laying hens consuming aflatoxin-contaminated feed. Poult. Sci.: 2176-2182.
  9. Wyatt, R.D., Doerr, J.A., Hamilton, P.B., and Burmeister, H.R. (1975). Egg production, shell thickness, and other physiological parameters of laying hens affected by T-2 toxin. Appl. Microbiol.: 641-645.
  10. Bryden, W.L. (2012). Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain: implications for animal productivity and feed security. Animal Feed Science and Technology: 134-158.
  11. Antonissen G., Devreese M., Van Immerseel F., De Baere S., Hessenberger S., Martel A., Croubels S. (2014). Chronic Exposure to Deoxynivalenol Has no Influence on the Oral Bioavailability of Fumonisin B1 in Broiler Chickens. Toxins 2015, 7, 560-571
  12. Grenier B. and Applegate T. J. (2013). Modulation of Intestinal Functions Following Mycotoxin Ingestion: Meta-Analysis of Published Experiments in Animals. Toxins 2013, 5, 396-430
  13. Akbari P., Braber S., Varasteh S., Alizadeh A., Garssen J., Fink‑Gremmels J. (2016). The intestinal barrier as an emerging target in the toxicological assessment of mycotoxins. Arch Toxicol DOI 10.1007/s00204-016-1794-8
  14. Pinton P., Tsybulskyy D., Lucioli J., Laffitte J., Callu P., Lyazhri F., Grosjean F., Bracarense A. P., Kolf-Clauw M., Oswald I. P. (2012). Toxicity of deoxynivalenol and its acetylated derivatives on the intestine: differential effects on morphology, barrier function, tight junction proteins, and mitogen-activated protein kinases. Toxicol Sci. 2012 Nov; 130(1):180-90.
  15. Awad, W.A., Böhm, J., Razzazi-Fazeli, E., Hulan, H.W., and Zentek, J. (2004). Effects of deoxynivalenol on feneral performance and electrophysiological properties of intestinal mucosa of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 83:1964-1972.
  16. Kubena, L.F., Harvey, R.B., Corrier, D.E., Huff, W.E., and Philips, T.D. (1987). Effects of feeding deoxynivalenol (DON, Vomitoxin)-contaminated wheat to female white leghorn chickens from day old through egg production. Poult. Sci., 66: 1612-1618.
  17. EFSA. (2004a). European Food Safety Authority. Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the commission related to deoxynivalenol as undesirable substance in animal feed. EFSA Journal 73: 1-35.
  18. EFSA. (2004b). European Food Safety Authority. Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the commission related to zearalenone as undesirable substance in animal feed. EFSA Journal 89: 1-41.
  19. Awad, W.A., Ghareeb, K., Böhm, J., Razzazi, E., Hellweg, P., and Zentek, J. (2008). The impact of the Fusarium toxin deoxynivalenol (DON) on poultry. International Journal of Poultry Science 7(9): 827-842.
  20. Pestka, J.J. (2007). Deoxynivalenol: toxicity, mechanisms and animal health risks. Animal Feed Science and Technology 137: 283-298.
  21. Harvey, R.B., Kubena, L.F., Huff, W.E., Elissalde, M.H., and Phillips, T.D. (1991). Hematologic and immunologic toxicity of deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated diets to growing chickens. Bull. Environ. Contam Toxicol.: 410-416.
  22. Kidd, M.T., Qureshi, M.A., Hagler, W.M. Jr., and Ali, R. (1997). T-2 tetraol is cytotoxic to a chicken macrophage cell line. Poult. Sci.: 311-313.
  23. Valenta, H. and Dänicke, S. (2005). Study on the transmission of deoxynivalenol and deepoxy-deoxynivalenol into eggs of laying hens using a high-performance liquid chromatography ultraviolet method with clean-up by immunoaffinity columns. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 49: 779–785.
  24. Dänicke, S., Valenta, H., Ueberschär, K.H., and Matthes, S. (2007). On the interactions between Fusarium toxin-contaminated wheat and non-starch-polysaccharide hydrolysing enzymes in turkey diets on performance, health and carry-over of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone. British Poultry Science 48(1): 39-48.
  25. Chi, M.S., Robison, T.S., Mirocha, C.J., Behrens, J.C., and Shimoda, W. (1978). Transmission of radioactivity into eggs from laying hens administered tritium labeled T-2 toxin. Poult. Sci. 57: 1234-1238.
  26. WHO. (1990). World Health Organization. Selected mycotoxins: ochratoxins, trichothecenes, ergot. Environmental Health Criteria (105), Geneva.
  27. Zinedine, A., Soriano, J.M., Molto, J.C., and Manes, J. (2007). Review on the toxicity, occurrence, metabolism, detoxification, regulations and intake of zearalenone: an oestrogenic mycotoxin. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1-18.
  28. Dwivedi, P., and Burns, R.B. (1984). Effect of ochratoxin A on immunoglobulins in broiler chicks. Res. Vet. Sci.: 117-121.
  29. Al-Anati, L., and Petzinger, E. (2006). Immunotoxic activity of ochratoxin A. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 29(2): 79-90.
  30. Grenier B., Schwartz-Zimmermann H.E., Caha S., Moll W.D. (2015). Dose-Dependent Effects on Sphingoid Bases and Cytokines in Chickens Fed Diets Prepared with Fusarium Verticillioides Culture Material Containing Fumonisins. Toxins 2015, 7, 1253-1272
  31. Antonissen G., Croubels S., Pasmans F., Ducatelle R., Eeckhaut V., Devreese M., Verlinden M., Haesebrouck F., Eeckhout M., De Saeger S., Antlinger B., Novak B., Martel A., Van Immerseel F. (2015) Fumonisins affect the intestinal microbial homeostasis in broiler chickens, predisposing to necrotic enteritis. Veterinary Research (2015) 46:98.
  32. Antonissen G., Eeckhaut V., Van Driessche K., Onrust L., Haesebrouck F., Ducatelle R., Moore R. J., Van Immerseel F. (2016) Microbial shifts associated with necrotic enteritis, Avian Pathology, DOI: 10.1080/03079457.2016.1152625. Online Journal.
  33. Poersch A.B., Trombetta F., Braga A. C. M., Boeira S. P., Oliveira M. S., Dilkin P., Mallmann C. A., Fighera M. R., Royes L. F. F., Oliveira M. S., Furian A. F. (2014) Involvement of oxidative stress in subacute toxicity induced by fumonisin B1 in broiler chicks. Veterinary Microbiology 174 (2014) 180–185
  34. Ledoux, D.R., Brown, T.P., Weibking, T.S., and Rottinghaus, G.E. (1992). Fumonisin toxicity in broiler chicks. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest: 330-333.
  35. Voss, K.A., Smith, G.W., and Haschek, W.M. (2007). Fumonisins: toxicokinetics, mechanism of action and toxicity. Animal Feed Science and Technology 137: 299-325.
  36. Weibking, T.S., Ledoux, D.R., Brown, T.P., and Rottinghaus, G.E. (1993). Fumonisin toxicity in turkey poults. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest: 75-83.
  37. Broomhead, J.N., Ledoux, D.R., Bermudez, A.J., and Rottinghaus, G.E. (2002). Chronic effects of fumonisin B1 in broilers and turkeys fed dietary treatments to market age. Poultry Science 81: 56-61.
  38. Javed, T., Dombrink-Kurtzman, M.A., Richard, J.L., Bennett, G.A., Coté, L.M., and Buck, W.B. (1995). Serohematologic alterations in broiler chicks on feed amended with Fusarium proliferatum culture material or fumonisin B1 and moniliformin. J Vet Diagn Invest 7: 520–526.
  39. Qureshi, M.A., and Hagler, W.M. Jr. (1992). Effect of fumonisin B1 exposure on chicken macrophage functions in vitro. Poult Sci, 71, 104-12.
  40. Prelusky, D.B., Rotter, B.A., and Rotter, R.G. (1994). Toxicology of mycotoxins. Mycotoxins in grains: compounds other than aflatoxin. Eds. Miller and Trenholm, Eagan press. St. Paul, MN: 359-403.
  41. Bandyopadhyay, R., Frederickson, D., McLaren, N., Odvody, G., and Ryley, M. (1998). Ergot: a new disease threat to sorghum in the Americas and Australia. Ranajit Bandyopadhyay. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India. Plant Disease 82(4): 356-367.
  42. EFSA. (2005). European Food Safety Authority. Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in food chain on a request from the commission related to ergot as undesirable substance in animal feed. EFSA Journal 225: 1-27.
  43. Huff, W.E., Kubena, L.F., Harvey, R.B., and Doerr, J.A. (1988), Mycotoxin interactions in poultry and swine. J. Anim. Sci. 66: 2351-2355.
  44. Grenier, B., Loureiro-Bracarense, A.P., Lucioli, J., Pacheco, G.D., Cossalter, A.M., Moll, W.D., Schatzmayr, G., and Oswald, I.P. (2011). Individual and combined effects of subclinical doses of deoxynivalenol and fumonisins in piglets. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 55: 61–771.
  45. Grenier, B., Dohnal, I., Shanmugasundaram, R., Eicher, S.D., Selvaraj, R.K., Schatzmayr, G., and Applegate, T.J. (2016). Susceptibility of broiler chickens to coccidiosis when fed subclinical doses of deoxynivalenol and fumonisins – Special emphasis on the immunological response and the mycotoxin interaction. Toxins 2016, 8, 231; doi:10.3390/toxins8080231.
  46. Antonissen G., Van Immerseel F., Pasmans F., Ducatelle R., Janssens G.P.J., De Baere S., Mountzouris K. C., Su S., Wong E. A., De Meulenaer B., Verlinden M., Devreese M., Haesebrouck F., Novak B., Dohnal I., Martel A., Croubels S. Mycotoxins Deoxynivalenol and Fumonisins Alter the Extrinsic Component of Intestinal Barrier in Broiler Chickens. J. Agric. Food Chem